|
|
Post by Clarence Black on May 31, 2009 10:45:05 GMT -5
Excuse me? Don't EVEN try comparing your gameplay to mine, Clarence. How did my gameplay suck--did you read my opening speech at all? Please explain. It's pretty clear that you are voting Courtney--so don't sugar things up like you said you weren't going to do, but just did.
If you really are being serious, give me a real question babe.
**OH AND BTW IF YOU ACTUALLY READ BOTH COURTNEY AND I'S OPENING SPEECHES YOU WOULD SEE WE USED PRETTY MUCH THE EXACT SAME STRATEGY, SO YOUR POINT DOESN'T REALLY MAKE SENSE AT ALL**
 [/color][/center][/quote] Yes I did read your opening statement, and it was complete bullshit. Oh, and how did I sugar things up? Yeah, I'm voting for Courtney but that doesn't mean I still can't ask questions. And that is a real question, I want the jury to know what you did alone so maybe you'll get their votes instead. I'm only trying to help you, not hurt you. So my point does make sense, I'm bout to pawp awff on a bitch! |
|
|
|
Post by Edgardo Rivera on May 31, 2009 13:50:28 GMT -5
First off Congrats. And BTW i do not get why we are answering in color that makes no sense.... Anyways.
I am bitter. I hardly even got to play this game becuase i won immunities for my tribe then i went to one tribal and my friend got out then another and i got out. So it stunk and you both were responsible. IT HURT. You could have told me. I could do NOTHING about it and you both decided to just "keep it away from me" That is dumb gameplay, from me becuase i would have liek to know from you guys (even though i knew i was going).
I really have no questions except for one. Say 3 reasons why the person sitting next to you should win over you. Thanks and i guess i wish you the best of luck..... |
|
|
|
Post by Sydney Wheeler on May 31, 2009 14:53:19 GMT -5
No question from me, I know how I am voting.
Good luck, you two.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Probst on May 31, 2009 20:13:59 GMT -5
Jurors can vote when ready.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jessica deBen on May 31, 2009 20:54:51 GMT -5
Well, since you complained about responding with color, I won't Edgardo.  . I know you ARE upset about the vote, and I wouldn't blame you. I was upset because I like you too, but you need a few blindsides here and there. It wasn't meant to be personal. Sorry. On to your question: 1. Strength. Courtney was good at challenges. She always came pretty close first place. 2. Loyalty. She was loyal to her alliances for the most part until she couldn't be any more. 3. Strategy. Courtney contributed good ideas to our strategy, which was helpful. Good Luck  [/center] |
|
|
|
Post by Courtney Marit on May 31, 2009 21:10:35 GMT -5
stands up to answer Helen's questionHey Helen. 1.Jason--> Like I've mentioned before; if anyone he was the most aware of what was going on. He figured everything out. Just tried working with the wrong people.  2.Helen--> You sticking to your word was smart. Once Jerri broke hers she was gone. And you kept your word. Didn't try to go against us. It just happens we knew you could be a threat later on. Had you passed that Final 5 mark. A fire would have been lit under you and probably beasted those last challenges. 3.Jerri--> You had your female alliance and you had your good friend Jason. You did know what was going on. If you knew how to stop it you should have done so. 4.Sydney--> Syd was a threat. She played it like a non-threat most of the game and out of nowhere she blew everyone out of the water. I was shocked. 5.Ozzy--> I think Ozzy played it very under the radar. Regardless what his strategy was it worked out for him. He would at least make an effort to ask who was the vote. 6.Edgardo--> Eddie didn't play the game like someone should. He just got stuck in this old Kamba alliance. Nothing else. 7.Clarence--> I think Clarence was lucky to made merger. After merger his name was brought up as an easy vote every time. To me this is a display of a weak player. Comparisons to real castaways: Sydney<-->Sierra I'd have to say Sierra. Sierra was consider a weak player during the pre-merge stage of Tocantins. Sydney wasn't consider as on of our stronger player and some of us even considered voting her out more than once if we were ever to lose in the old Kamba Tribe. However late merger she showed she is trying her hardest. And we saw Sierra breakout during merger and she was considered a physicla threat. Ozzy<-->Susie Susie was a random player...She would randomly pop up during the show. Then go back to being a non entity. I think Ozzy was a non entity the majority of the game and he went far just like Susie did. Helen<-->Natalie Natalie didn't stand out during half of Micronesia. Helen wasn't a memorable player during the pre-merger. During the merger she becamed a force to be reckoned with and she tagged a long with the major alliance just like Natalie did with the Favorites Alliance. Clarence<-->Courtney Yates Courtney Yates was a horribly weak player. Clarence is probably one of the reason old Ameru and new Ameru kept failing at everything. However he somehow managed to sneak by. Courtney in fact made Fei Long lose a challenge and yet another player paid the price. Clarence was in the shadows most of the game. And I do believe Courtney didn't make any solid moves during China. She just went along with the flow. Jerri<-->Ozzy[Cook Islands] Jerri like Ozzy was a BIG help in tribal challenges. At merger she was very good at challenges. Just like Ozzy was. But I believe she wasn't a STRONG strategist. And Ozzy to me didn't seem like a strong strategist during Cook Islands. Jason<-->Jonathan Jonathan was a smart player. He knew who was with who. He knew where to strike. The only reason he was voted out is because everyone realized he was a MAJOR threat. Simple as that. Jason was a THREAT to me personally. That's why he had to go. Edgardo<-->Kelly Goldsmith Kelly Goldsmith had bad luck. Edgardo had bad luck because he probably chose to stick with the wrong alliance and didn't do anything about it. I hope that works, Helen. sits back |
|
|
|
Post by Courtney Marit on May 31, 2009 21:11:33 GMT -5
stands up to answer Ozzy's question
Hey Oscar.
Well I believe I deserve to win over Jessica because I think I sometimes had more input or smarter options to our next move. I'm not taking anything away from Jessica. Also I believe I tried harder in challenges than Jessica. I made sure that I beat Jason during the colored square challenges so he would be FOR SURE the next one to go.
I hope that works, Oscar!
sits back
|
|
|
|
Post by Courtney Marit on May 31, 2009 21:12:16 GMT -5
stands up to answer Jerri's question
Hey Jerri.
Personally I believe that no one deserves it more than me because whatever I did was the right thing that got me here. Not someone else. If I have to choose someone I'd choose Jason. He was probably the smartest person or Helen as well. However there's something that I'd like to add. You guys might think that we were bad and such for picking all of you out. But you all should have made more solid choices when it came to tribal councils during pre-merger. I think keeping weak players for numbers is not smart. In the end it caused all of you to wind up in the jury. That's why I don't think anyone exactly deserves it more than me. Not to sound cocky tho.
The worst thing I had to do is flat out lie and backstab Kenny/Edgardo. They probably had intentions of sticking with us but Kenny made me really uneasy with the token thing. I got sort of paranoid like: "Does he have someone else other than our Core Four?" and such. Then Eddie probably would have tried to expose all of the old Kamba plan so he had to go.
sits back |
|
|
|
Post by Courtney Marit on May 31, 2009 21:16:31 GMT -5
stands up to anwer Edgardo's question
Hey Edgardo.
1.Memorable
I believe Jess name came up more than once. Whatever she was doing people felt threatened by her.
2.Not strong
I think that Jess relied more on strategy than winning immunity challenges. She won the pivotal immunity challenge. Which is very important.
3.Smart
Jess like me had knowledge about where to strike. What to do and such. She is a BIG key of why I'm here at the end. I didn't do this all by myself.
I hope that's enough, Eddie!
sits back |
|
|
|
Post by Courtney Marit on May 31, 2009 21:17:13 GMT -5
Thanks for the wishes, Sydney. [/color] |
|
|
|
Post by Jessica deBen on May 31, 2009 21:43:54 GMT -5
Hey Helen!
Ok here it goes:
1. Helen
Helen (you) were a super strong competitor in this game. You're strategy was pretty good, as you stuck with those who you knew would take you far. I would compare you to Natalie Bolton. You stuck with the strong players, and were a very fierce person yourself.
**COURTNEY STOLE NAT. DAMN!** Hm...who else can I compare you to? I guess Taj Johnson. She stuck with two strong people that would help her get to the end, and was a strong woman herself!
2. Jerri
Jerri was very loyal to her alliance, and was also a strong willed person who was constantly on top of her game. I would compare her to Ozzy Lusth (Micro.). Loyal to his alliance, yet his physical power caused him to be sent packing.
3. Sydney
Sydney was a strong player, even if she was a little quiet. She managed to make it quite far, winning a few challenges along the way. Unfortunately, she found herself third link on the chain. Sydney is like Cirie Fields (Micro.), she was a strong competitor, but wound up getting third due to a solid friendship that she could just not come between.
4. Jason
Jason was a strong contestant although his ways didn't go as planned. He seemed to not get how to break through alliances and was left singled out. I would compare him to Sierra Reed. He tried hard to survive at the end, yet he never really managed to stay afloat.
5. Edgardo
Edgardo was a pretty big threat, but wasn't as social as some of the players. He believed his past friends would carry him through which caused his downfall in a way. I would compare him to Ace Gordon. He relied on people who thought were his friends, and wound up being voted out.
6. Ozzy
Like Clarence, Ozzy was a floater this game. I saw him as a little smarter however, as he talked somewhat, although he just seemed to float by unnoticed until the end. I will compare Ozzy to Susie Smith. You forgot she was there until the end.
7. Clarence
Clarence pretty much was a floater and pretty forgettable for the whole game. If he had any strategy, it was doing nothing and getting far. I will compare him to Erinn Lobdell. He should have been gone a while ago but wound up floating pretty far.
Hope that works for ya Helen! [/center] |
|
|
|
Post by Jessica deBen on May 31, 2009 21:56:54 GMT -5
Hey Oz! Hm...that is a good question. I will have to disagree that Courtney had more input then me, like she said. I believe we both had an equal amount of input in out strategy and both of us stressed who we wanted out and why. Not trying to shoot her down or anything. I think I tried hard in challenges, and even though I wasn't a challenge whore or anything, I at least attempted to win the last challenge. Courtney only did the minimum, which is a little odd...I mean it is final immunity. I also think I may have been more social at times then her during the game. Hope that's good for you! Good Luck! |
|
|
|
Post by Jessica deBen on May 31, 2009 22:03:59 GMT -5
Thanks Syd.! Good Luck in your decision. [/b][/color] |
|
|
|
Post by Edgardo Rivera on May 31, 2009 23:12:49 GMT -5
This is an easy vote for me.
BTW Courtney that is ridiculous what you said.. I stuck to my alliance. You aren't supposed to do that? You betrayed (so did jess) i just do not understand how you can shoot my game play when you were the one that went against me for NO REASON! It just makes no sense we had the numbers and you syd and jess still could have had your three it is just so STUPID.
please do not respond i don't feel like reading what you have to say.
|
|
|
|
Post by Courtney Marit on Jun 1, 2009 9:46:12 GMT -5
It's ok Eddie I understand if you're mad. It was sort of wrong but you will see why when confessionals open. Good luck everyone voting & good luck Jess. <3 |
|
. I know you ARE upset about the vote, and I wouldn't blame you. I was upset because I like you too, but you need a few blindsides here and there. It wasn't meant to be personal. Sorry.
